Monday 24 February 2014

More on Latin America's protests



Following last week’s comments about protests in Venezuela, I got an email from Christian Novak chiding me for not taking my analysis farther and discussing whether the eventual collapse of the Maduro regime will have a knock on effect on other Latin American countries, such as Argentina, Bolivia, or Peru.

Guilty as charged.

President Christina Fernandez in Argentina is already on her way out. Last October’s elections did not give her the mandate she needed to change the constitution and run for a third term. Fernandez never militarized the economy the way Chavez did, whilst all her mistakes are homegrown; there are no foreign advisors, Cuban or otherwise. Neither the IMF approved reforms to the national inflation indices nor the settlement with Repsol over YPF would not be possible without her approval, stated or otherwise.

Collapsing foreign exchange reserves seem to have done an excellent job of concentrating Fernandez’s mind. Neither the IMF backed reforms to the national inflation indices nor the settlement with Repsol over YPF would not be possible without her approval, stated or otherwise, and she would only do so if she had no other choices. Argentina’s lack of a developed Energy industry to underwrite her excesses meant she was never able to push her nationalism as far as Chavez did, despite all the rhetoric and joint issuance of bonds.

Peruvians have been much harder on President Humala than Venezuelans were on Chavez. Lacking Chavez’s charisma, his popularity slumped as the economy slowed last year. Chavez was able to put many of his cronies into positions of authority where they could seek rents unopposed, whilst Humala’s attempts to do likewise were immediately met by street protests, forcing him into a humiliating climb down.

Unlike in Venezuela, Bolivia’s Evo Morales has used the commodities boom to accumulate Foreign Exchange reserves to insulate the economy from the inevitable fall in prices, so reserves/ GDP are now amongst the highest in the world. Whereas debt/ GDP is at record levels in Venezuela (when you factor in the Chinese Oil loan and the Government’s unpaid bills), it has fallen dramatically in Bolivia. Where he has nationalized an industry, Morales has ensured that they continue to invest back into the business and remain competitive.

None of these three countries are dependent on Venezuela in any form, so a change in Government in Venezuela is not going to cause them any hardship. Despite all their fraternal leftist rhetoric, what they have actually done in practice is qualitatively different to what Venezuela has done. Any future policy changes will be independent of any changes in Venezuela.

The one country where a material change in Venezuelan policy will impact them is Cuba. The presence of so many Cuban “advisors” in the country is being increasingly questioned, and is a source of tension. This video posted to Youtube shows the arrival of another planeload of Cubans at Caracas airport being told to “Get lost!”



Currently the island receives an unknown but significant amount of cheap oil. As Venezuela’s oil revenues shrink, it will be harder and harder to maintain these subsidies, and a less accommodative government in Caracas could be as disruptive to Havana as the fall of the Berlin wall.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Over the weekend, some of Venezuela’s protestors tried to link what they are doing to events in the Ukraine, but the differences are probably greater that the similarities; the demonstrations in Ukraine appear to be more broadly based than in Venezuela, with a more focused leadership. The protestors in Venezuela are still seen as being predominantly Middle-Class, without clearly defined goals. Having said that, the numbers attending the anti-Maduro marches are impressive - see the picture at the top.

Finally, Colgate Palmolive announced that they would take a one-off loss of $180-200M on Venezuela’s latest devaluation. I include this little tidbit not because it refers to Venezuela, but to emphasize the increasing role Emerging Markets play in the profitability of global multinationals.





No comments:

Post a Comment